By Naomi Schalit, senior reporter, ©Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting | Apr 21, 2010
Augusta — While he was Maine’s chief utilities regulator, Kurt Adams accepted an ownership interest in a leading wind-energy company. One month later, in May 2008, he went to work for that company, First Wind, as a senior vice president.
A “summary compensation table” in a recent SEC filing shows that Adams’ 2009 compensation of $1.3 million included $315,000 in salary, $658,000 in stock awards, $29,000 of “other” compensation and $315,000 in “non-equity incentives.”
It’s not clear yet how much the ownership interest — 1.2 million units of equity — that Adams got while still at the commission is worth, since First Wind has not put a value on the equity units in its SEC filings.
First Wind constructs, operates and owns wind turbines in the Northeast, the West and Hawaii. The company is the largest wind power developer in Maine, with farms at Mars Hill and at Stetson Mountain. Two other in-state projects are in the works in Oakfield and Rollins.
Cabanne Howard, a former assistant attorney general and now a law professor at the University of Southern Maine, said, “It’s against the law to offer or accept anything of value to a public official where the person making the offer has an interest in the work of the public official.”
Howard added, “You have to show that the purpose of the gift was to influence the person’s performance.”
Adams said at the time they were awarded to him, the equity units — which he called “stock” in an interview with the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting — had “no value at all,” and therefore shouldn’t trigger any state laws that bar improper gifts to public officials.
“There was no property interest granted while I was at the commission that I received,” said Adams.
And, said Adams, he never did First Wind any favors while he was at the commission.
“Those stock options, the grant date is on (April) the 16th, but there’s no value at all that accrues to you until one year after you work.”
Likewise, First Wind’s attorney, Paul Williams, said the award to Adams “had a prospective value that was unrealizable until after it had vested, which was about a year.” “If he had never started work,” said Williams, “he would have had something of no value, period.”
On page 140 of First Wind’s March 26, 2010, SEC filing, the company set Adams’ “vesting commencement date” for the equity units at April 16, 2008, the date Adams said he signed an employment contract with First Wind — and while he was still PUC chairman.
In the interview with the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, Adams described the equity units as part of the “overall compensation package” included in his employment contract with First Wind.
Adams said he signed the contract and got the equity units while he was still at the commission.
But in a 2008 First Wind “S-1” filing with the federal Securities and Exchange Commission, the company twice stated that Adams signed that employment contract a month later, May 19, 2008, — after he had left the commission.
“I can’t tell you why it was dated then,” said Adams. “The S-1 is not something I’m in charge of at First Wind. The securities filings are the province of the legal department.”
Williams, head of the legal department, said the May date “is just a clerical error. It was before my time. I don’t know how it got in there.”
Regardless of when he signed the contract with First Wind, one government watchdog group said the equity units awarded to Adams while he worked at the commission pose a problem.
“This is sort of like a lawyer coming into a courtroom saying, ‘Hey, here’s a bunch of stock in my firm’ and a judge taking it,” said David Lavinthal, spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, D.C.
“That judge can recuse himself all he wants from the trial in which that lawyer is a party, but the question is, is that an appropriate transaction? These things that are being given, they would at some point have value; is there any question in anyone’s mind at some point they will have value?”
Wind power needs PUC approval
While First Wind was not a state-regulated utility, its interests came before the commission in a variety of ways.
Adams said, “We didn’t regulate First Wind … it’s not like First Wind was at the commission frequently.”
Construction of transmission lines with the capacity to connect wind energy from Maine’s rural reaches to densely populated regions to the south can only happen with PUC approval.
First Wind’s 2008 press release announcing Adams’ hiring read:
“We are very excited to welcome Kurt to our team, and we know that his immense experience will help advance the transmission efforts for our projects across North America,” said Paul Gaynor, president and CEO of First Wind. “Through his most recent work as chairman of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, Kurt has a great working knowledge of the issues facing the wind industry.”
Among the qualifications Adams brought from his work at the PUC: “He also sited and approved infrastructure, including electricity delivery and transmission.”
Adams, wrote First Wind, “will primarily be responsible for the oversight and implementation of transmission planning for all of First Wind’s operating and development projects.”
Adams was chairman of the Maine Public Utilities Commission for three years, from April 2005 to May 2008. Prior to that, he was the in-house counsel for Gov. John Baldacci, who appointed him to the commission.
Adams’ tenure as PUC chairman coincided with a major initiative by the state to develop alternative energy resources, especially wind.
In concert with other New England states, Maine set an ambitious goal for alternative energy production over the next two decades and established economic incentives for that production. That has led both to accelerated growth in Maine’s wind-energy sector, as well as bottlenecks in a transmission system designed to carry far less energy than wind-power producers hope to generate.
Baldacci’s wind-energy task force reported in 2008 “the ability of Maine to achieve the ambitious goals for wind power development suggested in this report and to bring the many benefits of wind energy to Maine people depends, in part, on the existence of sufficient transmission line capacity. … In order to realize the tremendous potential of wind power in Maine, the existing challenges of interconnecting wind projects with the grid must be addressed.”
State law regulates gifts to public servants. It’s a criminal violation if a “public servant … solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit from a person if the public servant knows or reasonably should know that the purpose of the donor in making the gift is to influence the public servant in the performance of the public servant’s official duties or vote, or is intended as a reward for action on the part of the public servant.”
The statute applies also to anyone who “knowingly gives, offers, or promises any pecuniary benefit” for the purposes of influencing a public official.
To avoid conflict of interest, Adams said, “I recused myself from anything related to First Wind from when I accepted employment to when I left. I followed the statute by the book, told my employer and my colleagues.”
Adams said he faced no conflicts in the period before his departure announcement, when he was negotiating his contract with First Wind. Those negotiations, he said, were conducted over a very short period of time.
In December 2007 — four months before Adams signed on for the First Wind job — the agency intervened in a case that directly involved First Wind.
ISO-New England, the regional transmission organization that moves electricity from producers to consumers in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont, had disqualified First Wind’s Stetson Mountain project in Washington County from selling its power in an upcoming ISO-administered auction that held the promise of hefty financial returns for participating power generators.
ISO officials had determined the power being offered by Stetson would encounter a transmission problem in an overloaded transmission system and was therefore not a reliable source for inclusion in the auction.
The PUC filed an after-the-deadline protest of ISO’s disqualification of Stetson. The PUC’s protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission declared ISO’s ruling to be “inconsistent with Maine’s policy to promote renewable generation and reduce greenhouse gases. Further, the disqualification may discourage other renewable generators that may be seeking to locate in Maine.”
It was a strange move for the PUC, said Greg Williams, a Washington, D.C., attorney who has worked for the federal commission and currently represents the interests of utilities — including Maine power generator the Houlton Water District — before the commission.
“In a word, it is quite unusual to see the PUC step in on behalf of a single entity,” said Williams. “The PUC weighed in, filed a late intervention, pretty unusual, said it was real important that the New England ISO essentially give these guys a break and let them participate in that forward auction.”
The PUC’s protest filing — which was rejected by the federal agency —- was written by a staff attorney who worked under Adams.
Adams said he didn’t remember the Stetson filing. “It’s not ringing a bell,” he said.
New York AG questions First Wind
July 15, 2008, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo announced an investigation into First Wind and Connecticut-based wind energy company Noble Environmental Power, LLC.
Cuomo’s press release says, “Subpoenas were served on Newton, Massachusetts-based First Wind (formerly known as UPC Wind) and Essex, Connecticut-based Noble Environmental Power, LLC. They are part of an investigation into whether companies developing wind farms improperly sought or obtained land-use agreements with citizens and public officials; whether improper benefits were given to public officials to influence their actions, and whether they entered into anti-competitive agreements or practices.”
The investigation was a response, Cuomo said, to “numerous complaints regarding the two companies from citizens, groups and public officials in eight counties alleging improper relations between the companies and local officials and other improper practices.”
The investigation did not result in charges against the companies. Cuomo used it as leverage to establish a code of conduct for wind energy companies operating in New York. That code, adopted three months later and signed by the two companies, prohibits conflicts of interest between municipal officials and wind companies.
Adams said there were no improper relations between him and First Wind while he was head of the PUC. He said he called First Wind about going to work with them because he had a conflict as the head of the PUC.
The commission was set to deliberate over the massive power line expansion proposed by Central Maine Power – and that power line, said Adams, “is literally going to be built behind my house.”
Baldacci, in a statement released by his deputy chief of staff David Farmer, said, “The governor believes that Kurt took appropriate precautions during his final days at the PUC to make sure that no conflict developed concerning First Wind. If First Wind had had business before the PUC, the governor believes Kurt would have appropriately removed himself from the matter.”
John Clark, general manager of the Houlton Water Company, knows and likes Adams. “He’s the only commissioner and chairman that’s ever visited us to see what our concerns were,” said Clark.
But, he added, that Adams took the equity interest in First Wind while working for the commission is disturbing. “I’m not pleased,” Clark said. “If it happened, I feel badly about that. I wish he had waited, done something else. I have no idea about the legality of it, it just doesn’t look good.”
The Maine Center for Public Interest reporting is a nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism organization based in Hallowell. The e-mail is firstname.lastname@example.org. The Web site is pinetreewatchdog.org. See post here.